KIGS Consulting
Mogadishu
Enquire
All insights
Policy BriefMarch 2024 · 12 min read

Women's political participation in Somalia's 2021 electoral process: lessons and gaps

KIGS Governance Practice · Practice Note

Somalia's 2021 to 2022 indirect electoral process carried a 30 percent quota commitment for women's representation. The outcome fell short, but the process generated evidence about where the barriers actually sit. This analysis reviews quota implementation, the candidacy pipeline, and the structural changes required to sustain progress.

01

What the numbers say

Women secured roughly 20 percent of seats in the House of the People in the 2021 to 2022 process, against the 30 percent commitment and broadly level with the 24 percent achieved in 2016. Read as a headline, this is stagnation. Read against the process design, it is more instructive: outcomes varied sharply by federal member state and by the specific mechanics each electoral committee applied, which means implementation detail, not public attitude alone, is doing much of the work.

02

Where candidacies failed

The candidacy pipeline narrowed at three points. First, seat reservation was applied inconsistently: where specific seats were designated for women candidates only, women won them; where the quota remained an aspiration across all seats, clan negotiation processes defaulted to male candidates. Second, candidate registration fees, set at levels of 10,000 US dollars and above for parliamentary seats, priced out most women candidates who lacked access to clan financing networks. Third, the elder-led delegate selection stage filtered candidates before any vote occurred, and women were structurally underrepresented in the negotiating rooms where those selections were made.

Security threats against publicly visible women candidates operated across all three stages and imposed real costs, financial and personal, that male candidates did not face symmetrically.

03

What would change the trajectory

The evidence from 2021 points to mechanism design over persuasion campaigns. Reserved seats with women-only candidacy produced results; aspirational quotas did not. Fee waivers or reductions for women candidates address a measurable, documented barrier. Formal inclusion of women in delegate-selection bodies moves the intervention to the stage where outcomes are actually decided. And any transition toward one-person-one-vote elections should embed quota mechanics in the electoral law from the outset, because retrofitting them after seat allocation politics have consolidated has repeatedly failed.

None of this is complicated technically. All of it is contested politically, which is precisely why it belongs in the formal legal framework rather than in negotiated commitments that dissolve under pressure.

Key takeaways
  • 01Reserved seats delivered; aspirational quotas did not.
  • 02Registration fees are a documented, addressable barrier to women's candidacy.
  • 03Intervene at delegate selection, where outcomes are actually decided.
  • 04Embed quota mechanics in electoral law before the next transition, not after.
KIGS Governance Practice · March 2024Next: Engineering Brief
Working on a related assignment? Talk to the practice behind this note.
Get in touch